Royal Wedding

BTW, I recently posted a story about the new princess, which was titled 'My Encounter with Kate Middleton.' Watching all the pageantry today, I had to smile as I recalled what a naughty girl the fictional Kate was in my story..

That was a FICTIONAL Kate? Oh. I guess you fooled me. Maybe, then, I won't follow her quite so closely.

I don't find Camilla at all hot, she's a bit horsey, but I can see her turning Charles over her knee.

Being a confirmed Royalist, hopless romantic, and True Brit.I confess I spent every hour of Friday glued to the TV coverage of the Wedding, a magnificent spectacle from start to finish, and refreshing in these dark days of bad news about war deaths and Tornados etc.

Being a confirmed republican (that's Brit-style with a small 'r', not US-style with a capital R, of course), I've been doing my best to ignore the whole wretched bunting-draped farrago. However, I couldn't avoid one small interesting snippet of information: apparently William's nickname for Kate is 'Babykins'. Now what does that suggest to you, fellow-kinksters?

That's really cute, Phil, but it suggests to me that young Kate will find herself turned over the royal knee on a regular basis.

Ahhhh well, to me "babykins" doesn't suggest the right kind of kink for this Library.

If Prince William were to playfully call Kate "young lady" or "little girl," IMHO that would be more suggestive of a spankophile relationship--as would "mistress" or "madame" in the other direction, of course... --C.K.

Oh right - throw a wet blanket on Phil's and Seegee's fantasies, why don't you.

Ho humm. Grin!

Personally, as far as the so-called 'royals' go I think the French had the right idea in the late 1700s

I guess these days chopping their heads off would be considered a bit extreme so maybe one alternative would be to sell them to the USA (maybe throw in Tower Bridge as an inducement?)