Spanking video makers: Dear God, Just Stop It, Please?

Has anyone in the LSF, on this thread or elsewhere, actually made such a claim? If so, I must have missed it....

I think Bloo was commenting on the series of comments that expressed dislike at having a female's anus or vulva exposed during the course of the spanking. I believe all he's doing is pointing out what he sees as a certain irony in such objections considering the overall situation....not any specific statement about spanking and sexuality.

I fear, having read this thread, any existent or potential video maker would be at a loss as to what, if anything, he or she should include.

Perhaps, for their benefit, we should have a thread stating what we would like to see included.

Can't do it now though as the arrival of Mrs Tysout is imminent...I can hear the mice throwing themselves on the traps.

Both attractive women but I prefer Samantha Woodley and that girl in Firm hand's Boot camp whose name I forget! Plenty of good looking young women in spanking films nowadays although in the past there were some fairly ancient looking schoolgirls and French maids. There are some good video's around but the majority are dire. I wouldn't watch an ordinary porn video as it would have no interest for me. Bums are sexy but close-up's of genitalia are not for me. I think a lot of producers of spanking videos have no understanding of spanking eroticism. Maybe they would be better off making ordinary porn films where perhaps the viewing public are less critical. I feel a spanking film should have a certain authenticity. You need to be able to suspend disbelief and if for instance the headmaster looks like a night club bouncer you are going to struggle. What they need is a few experts on the set to dish out some advice on the finer points!

I am no expert on the demographics of those who actually purchase these films, are the majority of buyers true spankos or are they mainly purchased by those merely looking for a little titilation?

Obviously folk are buying enough of these videos to make it financially lucrative for the companies to continue, thus suggesting the majority of purchasers are happy with the content.

I will add that i completely agree with the majority of the negative comments made on this thread about spanking videos

Ah well seek the rare 24 carat gold spanking films, treasure them whilst ignoring the fools gold' spanking' films.

Well, I believe that the objections were to spanking videos which seemed to be focused on a female spankee's anus and/or vulva as opposed to her posterior. There's a difference between such exposure occurring naturally on occasion, in the course of a bare-bottom walloping, rather than it being contrived via the chastised woman assuming positions which normally aren't likely for a spankee to adopt, and/or the camera work focusing narrowly on the anus/vulva area rather than on her derriere as a whole.

If I'm watching an attractive woman being spanked on the bare behind (in my case preferably by another female), I want the bodily emphasis to be on her bouncing bumcheeks... --C.K.

I don't pretend my interest in spanking is anything but sexual but I'm with RikSpanks on this. I don't want a biology lesson when I see a girl being spanked. My turn on is spanking and I'd rather see a good mainstream spanking than many of the poor videos that are available. Some vids are good but I tend to turn them off when the camera shot is too intimate.

Amen to that!

blimp
I would heartily agree! Bouncing bum-cheeks do it for me too, but if it is exciting the spankee, then I like to know!
No I don't agree with having a "biology lesson", but I'll hold up my hand and confess that I do love a pretty pussy!

Are there any female commentators who can tell me if they look for an erection in male spanking videos?

I don't really watch videos but I do enjoy a good still shot. However, they suffer from the same maladies already described. If I could add something to the growing list it would be the look of 99% of the male spankers. (Maybe that's why I prefer F/F pictures?)

All these guys look like sleaze-balls. Paunchy, pony-tailed, greasy-looking porn producers. There's this one guy who is very popular, "Dallas". If a single look could shout out "I'm an asshole", he has it down cold. Another bunch are the European "masters", all looking like Russian mobsters who picked their victims out of cells in the basement after having abducted them from who-knows-where.

The other thing is how frequently these same guys show up (again most likely because it's their production and they want the action and screen time). Seeing the same guy over and over makes the whole scene less convincing as well and renders it just another shot in their pro-porn catalog.

I'm far more forgiving of the ladies. I can excuse a lot in both female counterparts, though I do agree with a lot of what has been said.

And, speaking of ladies, if there was ever a genre that was neglected, it's role/age reversal in F/F.