Another piece of advise: You get to decide how detailed you want to make your story, but if you're going to include a detail, get it right.
Example: Many years ago, on a BBS, I read a story that had a long description of how a girl was tied up. Every knot that was used, how long each segment of rope was, where each loop of rope was place - it was all there. Think of it as a written form of oriental bondage. We're talking about over 100 feet of rope involved in tying up one person. When I was reading it, well, I hit page down several times wondering "why didn't he say 'I tied her up' and skip all this?".
But there are people who really like that sort of thing, and several of them posted about the story - and they were angry that he had ruined the mood, teased them, and otherwise exetremely disappointed them. His crime? Somewhere in all that description, in the parts I skipped over, he had made a mistake. One of his knots (out of dozens, or maybe hunderds - I didn't count them) was wrong, and that ruined the story for the rope fans. He gave a detail that was wrong, and that ruined things for a certain type of readers.
I've seen the same thing happen in regards to other kinks. Someone who richly described the stockings that someone was wearing being dinged for using the wrong type of material, but it also happens with non-kink things. Especially in historical fiction when people get major details wrong. Things like a teenaged girl in 1952 being told that she can either be spanked or lose her phone (not her phone privileges, which would make sense, but her smart phone) for a month.
I'm not saying not to include details. Detail can make a story great. Just, well, try to get them right. |