Februs:
It's always baffled me as to why the American game is called football at all given that the ball hardly ever makes contact with anyone's feet.
As usual, we Americans don't like to take the blame for anything, even more so if it is actually our fault. So, I will attempt to blame this on the English.
The theory is this: American football is actually based more on rugby than on what we here in the states so quaintly call "soccer." Rugby was invented in England, itself a descendant of "soccer," (I will continue to call it "soccer," just to avoid confusion as I prattle on) and other "foot" related games, which were referred to as such not because players used their feet to kick a ball, but because it was played on foot (as opposed to horseback, which was more often a sign of game playing by the nobility, than "foot" games, played by the common folk) .
Soccer was originally called "Association Football "(it may still be called this, since, when it comes to soccer, I will refer back to the German portion of this thread, and say in my best Sgt Schultz voice "I know noTHINK; I see noTHINK"). When rugby first came into popularity, it was called "Rugby football" (even though, like its descendant, American football, a large part of the game is played with the hands). So, the name of American "football" is derived from Rugby "football." And, ipso facto, since Rugby football was named and invented in England, calling American football "football" (shortened to one word, because we cannot fathom taking all that extra time to say "American" every time we refer to it) is England's fault. I rest my case.
Later on, in a much less important argument than football, I will explain why - if we are descended from apes - there are still apes around. What, the present day apes haven't quite gotten around to evolving yet? Or, maybe seeing what a mess we humans have made of things, they have chosen not to.