Everybody has to decide for themselves what their comment policy is going to be as long as it is within the rules of the site, but I’m a bit nervous about setting the standards too high. If you’re an ‘ordinary’ writer of fiction, you get feedback in two different ways: You get - if you’re lucky - serious criticism from professional literary critics, and in addition you get informal comments from ordinary readers that cross your path. In this Library, there is only one channel for feedback, the comment section, and for good reason the comments are a mixed lot - some can almost be considered serious criticism, while others are more like a slap on the back (or, on rare occasions, a punch in the face). I wouldn’t miss any of them; although the former may be more helpful, the latter are also a welcome boost. When I started writing spanking stories, I first got them published on a (Scandinavian) site with no comment or feedback facilities, and it took something like a year and a half before I got an indication that somebody had actually read one of the stories. Publishing there seemed a bit like throwing a stone into the water and watch the rings disappear. For this reason I tend to disagree with
Gourmet:
A well-considered comment is worth ten comments. This requires multiple reads of the story and time.
It may be correct from an intellectual point of view, but I consider it just as important to keep the Library vibrant with activity. And believe me, when you haven't got a comment for a month or two, everything is welcome!