jools:
Perhaps because it is childlike escapism, written in the style of Enid Blyton, it was unpopular here on an adult website hehe. However it was my (albeit failed) attempt at political in-correctness by reinserting spankings into children's stories.
I did write a story for the SSS short story competition in this sort of genre. Called
Hide and Seek it parodies an actual reading scheme book of the same name I had as a child. It is not in the KLSF, nor yet in the other repository of my work Spanking Classics, as it contains minors; in one case Child/child and in the other case off-screen Parent/child. Whilst it's funny for the parody aspect of it, the fact that it contains these elements makes me uneasy.
njrick:
cayenne:
My weakest have been sequels.
I have NEVER had a successful sequel.
Sequels are, by their nature more difficult beasts to tame, one needs to have a better second idea to drive the story. Mostly those readers requesting a sequel are doing so precisely because the first story succeeded so well in its duty - that of leaving the reader wanting more - and therefore, are, by definition pretty good stories. For that reason it becomes harder to top it with a believeable subsequent idea.
Often an author will regurgitate the original story but in order to make up for the lack of novelty will make the spanking more severe. This rarely works in my opinion.
The main example of a sequel in my own work is
Inspector Doyle and the Strange Case of the Handcuffed Woman which I wrote in order to tell what happened after I had left the victim in an awkward ( if familiar within these pages) position at the end of
Inspector Doyle. It really isn't so good as the original, despite containing more spanking and more humour. It exists just to tell what happened next, and that's not necessarily the best reason to write a story.