Alef:
As a former Hornblower enthusiast, I can not leave this uncommented! Actually, I think you have a very good point, although I never thought of it that way myself (but then I was only a kid at the time). Hornblower definitely has a modern sensibility in many ways (e.g. with regard to corporal punishment!), but I always thought of it as being ahead of his time rather than being an anachronism. Occasionally, Forester will go out of his way to put Hornblower squarely into his period, e.g. in his reaction to literature (he adores Pope and Gibbon and struggles with the romantic poets).
True, but his unusually liberal (for the time) political views, his rejection of typical nautical superstition (for example the passage in regard to the source of the equinoctial gales), his views on hygiene and regular bathing, his views on social matters and lack of insistence on the importance of authority, his less than respectful opnions about royalty (including George III, the future George IV, and the Czar, not to mention the King of Sicily) all place him in more of a mid 20th C context in my mind. I feel that O'Brien handled this matter, and the rendition of Napoleonic era idiom, much better.