tiptopper:
The problem is that you can't have it two ways. Either it is for fun only or it is a contest. If it is for fun then a theme (challenge) would be introduced but there would be no voting and there would be no winners proclaimed. As, for example, a beach volleyball game where people try to do their best but nobody keeps score. Once voting is introduced and the top winners are announced then you have a contest no matter what you call it.
I disagree entirely. Having something that is intended to be viewed in a fun manner
and being able to vote are not mutually exclusive. As to the volleyball analogy I've already explained that such sporting references aren't applicable or useful. I also don't see the need to keep using such analogies, this is our site, our challenges and we can basically run them whichever way we prefer, irrespective of how beach volleyball is played or the pop charts are run.
In fact, although the judging is done by just a select handful of judges (or voters if you like) the Summer Story Contest hosted by the soc.sexuality.spanking newsgroup does not list ALL the entries in the order of merit, just the top 3 so they are no different to us in that respect. Personally, I prefer the way we do it in giving all of the site members a chance to participate.
tiptopper:
I think that most writers are curious as to where they place. Making known the top six and not the rest seems to me to be inconsistent. It can't be half a contest and half not a contest; either it is one or the other.
I've no evidence to support your claim that most writers want to know where they place but if they do then they can always send a popup. It's a challenge not a contest - authors are
challenged to write to a theme and then the readers (some of which are obviously authors too) get the chance to participate as well by casting their votes. I don't see anything inconsistent at all about just revealing the top 6 and I would much rather do that than have someone submit a story for the first time, score badly and be put off writing further stories or generally feel dismayed at how their story was received. The other aspect of the challenges is that they are intended to provide a showcase to illustrate the different creative approaches taken by different authors to a common theme. That is why I provided a separate standalone webpage for them.
Anyway, if the general consensus is that the participants don't like the way the challenges are run and we're going to be on the receiving end of this kind of feedback on a regular basis then I suggest we make this the last one as they're clearly not being viewed or enjoyed in the manner in which they were intended and as such I for one wouldn't want to persist with them.