Just Thought I Would Share This

Having spent considerable time on the "Raising Christian Girls" site, and just reading the post made by thepreacherswife, I have to conclude that she is on to something. All the so-called requirements that she mentions to become and to maintain membership are spot on. They have a list of rules and regulations which if violated will result in termination from the site.

I can see where some of us out there prefer stories or accounts with specific details lacking, which gives the account more credibility as possibly being factual. I have actually written some of my own short letter style stories with this idea in mind, although mine still present more detail that would be allowed on the raising Christian Girls Site.

Just keep in mind what I mentioned about real families living in the so- called Bible Belt of the US. Spankings there are real both at home and in schools.

I just checked out the rules on one of those forums. It talked about the need to be real, and that you needed 25 posts before they let you access the Spanking section.

They know why people join them, and it isn't to get real parenting advice.

Back when I used to go on chat at the sadly departed World Spanking Forum one topic of discussion was whether a site that was supposed to be a site advocating the abolition of paddling in school was in fact a site for someone into school paddling fantasies. It was called Southern Spanking and I haver never checked if it still might be around.
One thing that raised suspicion that it was not what it purported to be was that invariably the case studies and examples of paddlings were girls. Actual data shows that boys are much more likely to be paddled in school systems permitting its use.
Whats more, it was always pretty,popular high school girls, like cheerleaders and homecoming queens that got it. One example I recall was a member of of the girls track team who got cited for some rule infraction and just happened to be wearing a very thin and skimpy,cheeky pair of track shorts!
Someone else pointed out that the picture on their site had in fact been taken from some spanking site.
I hope indeed that the site in question here is in indeed fantasy and not someone's sick warped version of religion-based childrearing.

This is why I've ALWAYS had an issue as it pertains to mixing spanking w/religion. What I mean by that is that it's one thing to have a spanking fetish & be able to indulge in it with other discreet, CONSENTING ADULTS!!!!! Key words CONSENTING ADULTS!!! To have sites online about so called "child rearing" that would detail how to spank a child has always been disturbing to me. I can only speak for myself when I say that I am in NO WAY inclined to take advantage of little girls with the sole intent on subjecting them to some sick fantasy. I just don't get how that would even begin to enter a grown man or woman's mind to begin with.

It's one thing to role play w/other CONSENTING ADULTS because at the end of the day they're still ADULTS, but there are some truly deranged people in throw world that prey on children in this way, even within their own families!!! Who in the hell does that??!! If you're into spanking, hell, even Domestic Discipline, do it because you are into it or see a benefit from it, but to use religion as an excuse to indulge in your link is below even the most base behavior. I apologize if this offends anyone here, but I just couldn't hold my tongue on this subject.

To bunwarmer36, I think all here are in agreement with you. To Redskinluver, I remember the Southern Spanking site. You are absolutely right, in California many years ago when I was in Jr. High, paddling was still allowed and practiced in public and certainly, in private schools. Thing is, in my Jr. High, only the boys got swats, not the girls. And yes, research does show that it is much more likely that the boys would get it.

Hmmm...that sounds familiar....

Oh yeah: Shorts 1 by Paul Jackson

You have stated the important considerations on this subject. Trolling others for scintillation and satisfaction has been a part of the spanking scene for over a century. Find that hard to believe? My research through newspaper archives reveals that by the second decade of the last century people were already writing preposterous letters to the advice columnists of the day that included spicy details about older teen girls being spanked by parent or older sibling. The 1920s brought a flurry of 'genuine" stories about flappers being subject to the most embarrassing forms of corporal punishment. In the 1940s through the '70s over-the-knee, bare-bottom, hairbrush spanking was the sure cure for what was wrong with bobby-soxers, delinquents, flower-power girls and eventually mean girls. For sure, there was a whole lot of actual domestic discipline going on throughout these decades as there always has been and many of those seeking advice, handing out words of wisdom or just bemoaning their fate were relating actual accounts involving mischief and punishment. But it is plain to see that the genuine accounts do not elaborate on the details of the spanking to the point of being salacious. The most genuine of letters mention the spanking as incidental to the over-all problem of injustice such as, "He told me to go immediately home where I received a long scolding, a sound spanking and a warning never to talk to boys again".

In the world of today's social electronic media the, wise to the ways of the troll, advice column has been replaced, for that purpose, by such vehicles for trolling as the site mentioned here or with Yahoo! answers and other features of the internet that offer the anonymous user the opportunity to encourage the desired fetish feeding response. No harm, no foul I guess as long as one does not involve the naïve, innocent or minor. Anyway as of today 3/17/16 the banner "advertisement" over this very comment is for "The Spanking of Teenage Daughters Book 1" a delightful collection I'm sure by a skilled writer. Anyway, keeping that in mind let's not go about casting stones at folks who have the same fetish we do but perhaps go about feeding it in a slightly different way.

Indeed. Search the Chicago Tribune Archives (FREE!) for spanking to retrieve any number of stories and advice columns on the subject. I dare say that the bogus spanking fetish letters to newspapers predate 1900 by some stretch, as well outlined in Ian Gibson's The English Vice - The 1860s had flagellation columns appear in Englishwoman's Domestic Magazine; but there are plenty of earlier examples.

And lets not forget the Pearl. Been a long time since I read it but seem to recall some of the material was in the form of letters.