I usually fall towards the side of the students in school disputes such as these, but in this case, I think the school offered a very reasonable compromise, allowing her to include the picture as a Senior ad, but not as a Senior Portrait. "Portrait" has traditional connotations of a more formal head and shoulders picture, not a full body one, no matter what that body happens to be wearing (or not wearing, as the case may be). So, I think it is inappropriate as a portrait" for that reason alone. Include it somehwere else in the yearbook - either as a Senior ad, as the school suggests, or, as someone else mentioned in one of the earlier posts, as one of any number of candids shot of students hanging out around the school.
And if, as the article infers near its end, this actually violates anyone's civil rights, then I think it is time for the world to shut itself down and reboot. Sheesh! |