There is an apocryphal tale of a budding writer breathlessly rushing into a publisher's office and asking "What is the average length of a novel?" The publisher thinks for a few seconds, and answers "About 90,000 words." The writer gives out a great big sigh of relief, and says "Thank god. I've finished!"
Me, I've hardly ever written a story I couldn't make longer. Initially, I would send them in as a whole, almost always more than 5000 words. Then I chopped a few up into shorter, more "readable" parts, but I wasn't thrilled about the way they came out. So I went back to writing the longer stories, realizing there would likely be fewer readers, since LSF readers - or possibly most readers of this genre - seem to prefer stories of 3000 words or less. Lately, I have worked out an imperfect solution: I am not writing any stories, so I have no worries about how long these unwritten stories will be. Also, I find editing these stories to be far easier than ones I've actually written.
I generally agree with what previous commenters have written: If a story is good, it dosen't much matter how long it is. People will read it (eventually), and enjoy it. But if an author is looking to increase his or her readership beyond the LSF average, shorter is probably better. Either that, or create a rip-roaringly, universally titillating title, which grabs all potential readers so hard they cannot stop themselves immediately opening the story. |