I see someone is offended. It is called a typo (and is a common one). Although "conceited" has been vaguely appropriate to the main proponents of the theory.
Where is the irony? Also knowing (not thinking) the idea of "Cultural Marxism" is a conspiracy theory and "dismiss[ing] the humanity of someone whose politics he hates" aren't mutually exclusive. Next you'll be saying someone can't know that man has been to the moon and yet would happily see Pol Pot plugged between the eyes. So I am not sure where you are going with that argument.
Something that is ironic is someone saying you should say what you want and no one should be offended, and yet, getting offended when someone makes a joke (with some truth; ask many a miner or dockworker or 70% of Northern England whether they would have been sad if Thatcher was assassinated by the IRA) about someone they, and many, others find to be utterly vile and repulsive. Is she a prophet now? Is it blasphemous to say things against St. Margaret Peace-Be-Upon-Her.
blimpBut even then used this countries resources when she should have spent her private income looking for her worthless son. I otherwise agree.
Saying that I can admit that there are many people I wouldn't be sad if they die or were killed. I can admit this and I'm sure many people can. Is anyone here sad that Pinochet or Mussolini died?