i recently found in a charity shop "Centuries of Childhood" by Philippe Aries, which i vaguely remember reading as a student. In the light of all that we have read since, its few spanking-related remarks are pretty tame, but I was struck by one phrase:
Starting from Mediaeval discipline being everywhere pretty barbarous (and the French were giving up corporal punishment even before the Revolution), and comparing English and French educational discipline in the Napoleonic period and after, he says of England: "If the birch was retained, it was no longer simply as a punishment but above all as an instrument of education, an opportunity for the boy being flogged to exercise self-control, the first duty of an English gentleman ".
It struck me that this is especially significant, because in the ideal (to me, anyway) spanking story or film it is important that the recipient, regardless of sex, regardless of age, regardless of how hard it objectively is, regardless of willingness or otherwise to suffer the punishment, should at any rate attempt to receive it without complaint or without admission of discomfort (and, of course, regardless of eventual success in this!) If they are from the beginning shouting and crying, the story will lose all its challenge and most of its point! Do others agree? And does this really show differences in attitudes to spanking fiction in those from either side of the Channel, matching, as Aries seems to think, their attitudes in real-life education?
Ernest |