opb:
I feel that there is something not quite right about 1st person
To me, 1st person always seems the most natural way to tell a story, just like an eye-witness account in a news report. After all, how does a third person know what happened if they weren't even there? I have occasionally come across a technical problem with it though. If you want your narrator to experience some sort of epiphany or revelation in the course of the story, they have to somehow conceal their new knowledge while they're telling the early part of the story. One way round this is to use a diary format, but that doesn't work if the action takes place in a short span of time.
However, it was only a couple of days ago that the most important advantage of 1st person occurred to me. If someone criticises your writing style, you simply point out that it's not
your style, it's your narrator's style!