Thanks for all the replies. Such an interesting discussion.
I think the those who object to the word seem to do so because, A, it is sexualised, or B, because it is a diminutive form of 'pant' and therefore, in someway, diminishes women.
I think that the first is a little misdirected. Panties can be sexualised no matter what they are called. There is a large industry selling flattering sexy panties so we can only assume there is a market for 'sexy' panties (however that is decided on. For one person, lacy frilly panties are sexy, while for another, a sexy panties is little more than a thong) irrespective of the name.
Perhaps there is more in the second objection, that using diminutive words for women and their clothing tends to diminish women in general. I don't agree, by the way, just that I can see the argument. But if, as opb above suggest, the diminutive is used only to distinguish inner from outer garments , then the second objection is also misdirected.
Jogreenknickers, it is interesting that you feel panties are more alluring. It is very interesting to get the female perspective. Was there a reason you used knickers rather than panties in you user name? |