The economics of it.

danjackson84
Part of what you said shows you didn't pay attention to what I said. Another part of what you said was what I had said in the first two attempts, but neglected to say in the final.

Dallas and Michael Masterson are two who I would classify as "small production companies." I've met Dallas and talked with him enough to know he is feral in thinking EVERYONE steals his content for free. I told him "no" three times, and each time I got angier because he kept trying to weedle me into admitting I actually do.

Now, yes, some only show snippets, while others post one full early production video with a really hot model, to make you think that's what all their content is like. The telltale way to know, is to look at who posted the video. It's as simple as that. SpankingGlamor is one such that posted an early production video. Outlaw is another. Another company which has changed names a couple times is a third. There's a fourth that hasn't changed names is another, but I can't think of their name. SpankingGlamour has also taken to posting snippets on tube sites. The main purpose of this is to avoid paying for multiple viewings of their snippets which costs them tons of money from their IP's, whereas tubes fund themselves via secondary advertising.

I think if advertisers wasn't so afraid of associating with 'porn', that a video sharing site like SpankingTube can make enough many for producers sharing their content 'for free'! By urging loyal customers for the measly gesture of watching the optional commercial at the beginning of their videos (often a minute or less), they can --I think-- have enough money from this ad revenue to cover the cost and get a decent profit on top of it, and if not, then it's due to the viewers not admiring the content, rather than for a "paranoiac piracy reasoning" which is understandably both plausible and comforting for a producer to avoid admitting that his/her content isn't actually that appealing to their target audience.

Of course, this isn't likely to happen-- even Youtubers who genuinely focus solely on sex educational videos (of the vanilla persuasion, and without any trace of sensuality) get demonetized, and can only get by via patrons' donations, or reviewing sex toys.