Ok, I'm going out on a limb here, because I'm going to DEFEND the '50 Shades' books and the first film! First of all, they are NOT spanking stories, they are stories with a little spanking in them. They may not be described with the same excellent quality as we would like, they are definitely mild and not particularly well written or portrayed in the film as far as these events go, but they are in mainstream and have instigated interest in our kink! Yes, they contain BDSM, and the details may not be accurate, but again, it is bringing the subject into the open, and is not porn! I realise the suggestion is that people into BDSM are 'damaged', but you have to take it that in the case of Christian, he is damaged. He uses his power to overcome his past. We all lose ourselves in our kink don't we?
I look at the whole thing as a love story that has more than a few difficulties, with a few thrills along the way, vastly different from the usual type of stories. So, if it has grasped the interest of mostly 'vanilla' people, so what? They couldn't possibly have made the film like the books, but that is no surprise. I think we should celebrate this as at least a little attention to something we love, being brought into the open.
I am going to see the second film and will go with an open mind. I just felt I needed to be a voice (even if I'm the only one) to speak in its defence!
