EXPLANATIONS PLEASE - (only non commentors need reply)(ha ha as if!)

I would have thought if someone doesn't comment it is because they can't be arsed to comment, whether they are practising onanists or not is nothing to do with it. Without a shred of evidence your "theory" is looking rather limp I am afraid!

This.

What do you mean "practising?" I've done it so often, I am an expert!

(It is interesting that when I spell checked this post, the spell checker could not find "onanist" as a real word. Instead, it suggested "organist." Which, taken in the non-musical way, might be the same thing!).

blimp
To you perhaps, but I've had this discussion with friends in real life about this topic and when I mentioned my theory there was a consensus of agreement. No one want sto think of this site as primarily 'wank fodder' (to use flopsy's term) and authors and moderators put too much effort into what happens here to want to believe it. But in reality that is what goes on to a decent (or indecent) degree. Like it or not.

I do hate to be rude but really if talking out of your arse ever becomes an Olympic event you will stand a fabulous chance of obtaining a gold medal. Again wild theories and not a shred of evidence excepting your equally foolish friends agreed with you. Like it or not you are talking absolute tripe but I can see there is no point in arguing with you.

I've no idea where you are getting your data from but you appear to have somehow gathered statistics from our user base of almost 15,000 members. You're also speaking on behalf of myself, flopsy and the moderators, again without having any idea as to what we actually feel about things. If you see the site as "wank fodder" that's fine by me but I'd appreciate it if you'd stop speaking on behalf of everyone else and give it a rest, especially as it's a topic that's been done to death and is now becoming more than a little tedious.