I often leave lengthy, in depth comments, and, while I always find something good to say about a story, I don't shy away from commenting on elements of the story which I find less than positive. That includes grammar, spelling, misusing a word, tense issues, and character name inconsistencies, as well as more subjective comments regarding style, plot, pace, POV, and anything else I can think of, which, in my opinion, could have improved the story. The key words here are "my opinion." I'm making the comment, and it is just MY opinion. I don't mind if the author disregards it, disagrees with it, thinks I'm wrong and likely a maroon for making it, or if he/she agrees with it. He/she may be right, and I may be wrong. Doesn't matter to me, and - again, in my opinion - it shouldn't't matter to the author either.
If we want comments on our stories - and I think most of us do - we should be willing to accept negative comments along with the adulation. At the very least, don't get upset by them. It's rarely personal -in my case it never is - and it is just one person's opinion (which, as most people know, are like noses - everyone has one).
It is true that few of us here are professional writers. I am not, for sure. But I don't see what that has to do with positive vs. negative comments. I assume most of us who write want to write the best story we can, whatever our topic. If we keep making the same grammatical mistakes over and over again, and no one tells us they are wrong, how does that help anyone? The reader sees the error, but chooses to keep his/her head in the sand, and the author keeps going on, oblivious to whatever errors he or she has made. The same is true for any other type of technical error; how can an author write the best possible story, if he or she is not aware of the rules of the game?
In the stories I've read for the challenge, I have come across random misplaced apostrophes, and other words which required apostrophes, and had none. I have come across misspellings, and misuse of words (two stories used the word "discrete" when the author probably meant "discreet," - for some reason, this error rankles me, and I pointed it out). I have read at least two stories in which the POV changes halfway through, without warning or an obvious purpose, other than the author might not have been able to tell the story without doing so. Several stories had confusing character name issues, mixing up one character with another, or, in one case, putting in a character name which hadn't been seen before, and wasn't seen after either. I commented on many of these errors.
Do I make mistakes? Yes, tons of them! I have probably done all of the things I just mentioned, and also done dozens of other things of which I am not proud. Do I like having them pointed out? No. Do I appreciate having them pointed out? Yes, very much. Maybe it will make me more careful in the future. Maybe I didn't even know I made an error, or didn't know what rule of language I had broken. Or maybe a comment on plot, pace, character development, or something else will teach me a thing or two, and help me write a better story next time.
I agree with DarkRiver about the popups - some are not enabled. Also, I don't always receive popups others send me, at least not right away, so they may be a bit unreliable. But, even if that wasn't so, I still prefer to leave a public comment on a story. The story is there, in front of me, and I am commenting on it. I don't believe I should have to separate my commets into positve and negative, and then post the positive part, and send the negativepart via popup. Doesn't make sense to me.
Take it from someone who gets an average of about 2 comments for every 100 reads (and that includes challenge stories, on which the average is much, much higher - so you can imagine how low the comment ratio is on my non-challenge stories): I want every comment you can muster; positve, negative, neutral, useful, funny, ridiculous, long, short, critical, whatever. Just comment, baby. |