I agree that some books on how to write are unhelpful or worse than useless. Two examples (neither of which I actually bought): A book whose author seemed to be obsessed, not with the creative part of writing, but with typing - she encouraged writers to type out a first draft, correct it, then type it all out again, then repeat the process, then type out a new copy for each publisher they sent it to - for no apparent reason. The mystery was solved by a glance at the original publishing date, which revealed that, although the book had a fresh modern cover and advertised itself as up-to-date, it had actually been written some decades earlier, before the invention of word processors!
Another book was absolutely dictatorial in the routine it expected the budding author to follow - they were to spend at least two hours in the morning and two in the afternoon sitting at their desk writing whatever came into their heads. At the end of each week they were to read through what they had written, discard 90% and condense the remainder down into one or two pages. If they went anywhere they were to carry, at all times, three notebooks and three pens of different colours, one for writing down descriptions of people, scenery and objects, one for recording dialogue (eavesdropping on strangers' private conversations was another part of the prescribed daily routine), and one for noting any ideas the author might have. After five years of this (and presumably having reduced himself to penury - there was no time in the routine for distractions such as working for a living), the author would, it was claimed, have produced his first book. After giving standard advice on submitting his work to publishers, the writer of this helpful guide concluded that the greatest lesson the would-be author would learn from this experience was "...that first books never sell"! I suspect the author of that book of attempting to improve the chances of getting his own work published by discouraging competition from new writers! |