jimisim:
It would be nice though to get back to the badinage and joshing that was so enjoyable in the early days.
I josh and banter with the best of them (well, maybe not THE best, because Pink is in a class by herself, but certainly in the next tier). And if I knew what badinage is, I'm pretty sure I can do that well too (though I don't know if there is a statistic that could prove it). And the banter STILL goes on here on the Forum. I'm been bantering on a few threads just in the past few days.
I start a lot of threads recognizing when authors and commenters reach milestones. Why, I believe the commenters DESERVE some appreciation and recognition. And the authors, even if they're not writing "to the numbers," I feel should get a little extra pat on the back when they clearly have "spoken" to a great number of readers. Anybody who keeps writing is going to get there. I'll be happy to acknowledge the 100th author who reaches a thousand comments. I WANT the authors to keep going.
The challenges recognize authors in another way - and often authors who aren't among the most prolific or "popular," just because they're anonymous.
Most of my own reading these days is divided in two categories. The first is checking out stories from MY favorite authors, whether or not they have been especially prolific, and whether or not they (or their stories - because it's truly about the stories) seem to get much recognition.
The second category is mining the library for the seldom-viewed stories, often by obscure autors. There are some gems her. My recent "Story of the Day" nomination was in that category - a story loaded here 3 years ago, by an author who's not active here and hasn't written anything new in years. That story had NO comments from its few readers before I made the first. I nominated it not because it was "popular" (because it obviously wasn't), but because it was GOOD (and overlooked."
More people should take the effort to find those obscure stories. And for those who are too lazy, the SOTD is an excellent way for those more energetic "miners" to bring their finds to everyone else's attention.
Oh - and I comment on the stories I read - close to 40% of them anyway. Not Sebastion or CS by any stretch of the imagination, but far more than most. And I do this NOT to boost anyone's statistics, but because I want to five feedback and reinforcement to the authors.
I find statistics are fascinating. I apologize to anyone who disagrees (and to my baseball-loving friends, I apologize for the apology). But raw statistics are meaningless - mere numbers. It's how they can be analyzed to find the "truths" behind them. Their areo opf course, charlatans (i.e., anyone who disagrees with my conclusions), who claim teh numbers support a premise that is false.
jimisim:
I feel I must apologise to NJR as I read the thread and thought OMG he's off on one of his statistical nonsenses again. Nothing personal you understand.
Apology accepted. And I WAS off on one of my statistical rants - one that I thought, of course, was rather interesting.