Erwin:
galt54: Maybe I should have been born in 19th century England. I might have felt more at home there. Those were reputedly the golden days of the English Vice!
But would you then have been a noble man there?
Because if not, if you would have been one of the working class you would have been one of them who got the whippings. This were only golden days for the landed gentry and for some priests (as it is today, too) and for the rich and very high noble men as the Prince Regent and his entourage, but that's the same today. Suppression, that's it, if of civil rights or sexuality or other is ever only for the poor, even today.
But in "our repressed culture" more people have much more freedom of choice as in the time you wish to live in.
If you are the king, you can have prostitutes, or visiting sex clubs and somebody who wish to make a little money by selling a scandalous book about that, may make some small ripples on the surface of the Skärgården. A spanker like Hans Scheike is despised from all the brave citizen.
Well, for most of the 19th century the British Empire had a queen rather than a king, and she was reputedly rather sexually repressed although she did have a number of children.
There was also a rising property-owning business class (bourgeoisie) that was gradually replacing the traditional landed aristocracy as the wealthiest group in the Empire.
As far as spanking goes, it was practiced to some degree behind closed doors by both the "old" and "new" nobility for erotic purposes and certainly in the boarding schools for the children of the economic elite for ostensibly punitive purposes.
Of course, the children of the working class, especially the boys, generally received plenty of sound corporal punishment, from both their parents and civil authorities, in order to "keep them in line" and "teach them their place" so that they'd accept their roles in the existing social order. (I seriously doubt that there was much erotic spanking play among adults of the lower classes, although men might beat their wives to assert their marital dominance.)
So I would agree that, in 19th century England, the practicing of corporal punishment would've been influenced by one's social class--although officially it would've been socially accepted only as discipline... --C.K.