rollin:
I fear you may be right. Readers seem to be most enthusiastic about items that are 1000-2500 words long and, really, are mere descriptions of spankings grafted onto some flimsy premise. That is a discouraging fact for those of us who want to tell a more involved story
I must take exception, not so much to what you said (or intended to imply) as to what might be inferred. Almost ALL of my stories come in somewhere between 1,000 and 2,500 words, and very seldom (in my opinion anyway) are they mere descriptions of spankings grafted onto some flimsy premise. Without going in the other direction to disparage longer stories, I will say that it's quite possible to tell a real STORY in the 1000-2500 word range. I think I was even able to do it recently with a 300-word snippet. The craft of GOOD story-telling can be executed in both longer and shorter works.
rollin:
One thing that continually amazes me as I look at the stats is the fact that with multipart stories---not just me---everyone, is that there is typically a 50% drop in reads between part 1 and part 2 and that ratio never changes.
That's not mystifying at all. When a member clicks on any story, he/she doesn't really know what it's about or whether he/she will like it or finish it. If it's a stand-alone story, the view still shows up as a 'view' even if the reader exits well before completing it ()which you can spot on the Activity Page as redres go quicly from one story to the next). On a multi-part story, that will happen with the first view (with some liking and therefore finishing the story) but almost never on a 2nd part, since the reader who didn't like part 1 will never view part 2.