It would make an interesting contest to see how many terms we could craft that bring to mind the human genitalia. Truth is, our language is rich enough that the result would be infinite. This makes me wonder why some authors persist in using such basic terms as "cock" or "pussy".
In a recent story by Billboard, his male character repeatedly refers to the antics of his "little Captain". In the context of his story, there is no doubt of what he is making reference to, yet it seems so much more civilized than "throbbing cock".
In the case of female anatomy, the possibilities are even richer. "Her lowest lips", "her secret delta", "the focus of her femininity", "the dampness below" ... We could go on forever.
When one is trying to depict basic primitive rutting passion, then one might wish to resort to basic primitive language; but otherwise, wouldn't it be better to explore the richness of our language?
Am I wrong? |